jump to navigation

Hot Topic – Checkbook Control / IRA LLC April 11, 2008

Posted by Jeff Nabers in : Self Directed IRA Solo 401k , trackback

I work in the field of Self Directed IRAs & 401(k)s. Based on the phone calls and emails we receive, by far the most discussed topic is checkbook control. Some people want it; others don’t. Some service providers support it; others discourage it.

What is it?

What most people are referring to when they say checkbook control is an investment structure that is formed as follows:

  1. A person opens an IRA account at a self directed custodian and transfers other retirement account funds into it.
  2. The accountholder has a Special Purpose LLC created and names themselves as LLC manager.
  3. The accountholder directs their custodian to invest some or all of the IRA funds into the newly created LLC.
  4. The LLC further invests its funds, often into real estate, private companies, or mortgage notes. The LLC is owned by the IRA, but managed by the IRA accountholder. Because the manager is the authorized signor on all LLC accounts, this is known as checkbook control.

The legitimacy of this structure was verified in a tax court decision.

Why would somebody WANT checkbook control?

Why would somebody NOT want checkbook control?

Here’s where the confusion and disagreement occurs. The argument against checkbook control is based on compliance, mostly with prohibited transactions, which in a nutshell are “self dealing” transactions. Self dealing means the accountholder causing the retirement account to buy, sell, or otherwise enter into a transaction with a disqualified person. This category of people includes the accountholder, most of his relatives, and anyone who provides services to the retirement account. So the argument goes like this:

“Prohibited transactions are costly. Without a custodian overseeing your transactions, you are at higher risk of doing a prohibited transaction and paying large tax penalties as a consequence.”

I always do my best to maintain an objective, balanced viewpoint. In light of the above argument, I formed the opinion that it’s good for some people to have checkbook control and risky for others. Therefore, whether checkbook control is appropriate is dependent on the circumstances of the accountholder. I operated under this thinking for over a year…

Then I learned more about the actual matter at hand.

… and have come to a completely different conclusion. Here are the newly discovered facts:

  1. A custodian cannot advise you on whether a proposed transaction is compliant. It is a legal matter, and only an attorney can give you legal information that you can act and rely upon.
  2. A custodian will not allow you to open an account unless you hold them harmless for their guidance and actions relating to prohibited transactions and legal compliance.
  3. In every retirement account, the person solely responsible for prohibited transaction compliance is the decision maker (aka fiduciary – the one who has discretion over how plan assets are invested). A custodian is not a fiduciary. You make the decision, they only follow through with them.
  4. In the event of a prohibited transaction in a self directed account, the accountholder will suffer the consequences regardless of whether they had checkbook control.

Okay, so all in all, #4 is what’s important. The idea here is that transacting without checkbook control does not take you off the hook in terms of PTs.

It is easy to know if there is PT risk

Determining whether a proposed transaction is actually a PT is hard. But determining whether something might be a PT is easy. Here’s the 3 step process:

  1. Make a list of disqualified persons. This list should include your spouse, ancestors, lineal descendants (children, grandchildren, etc), and spouses of lineal descendants. Also include anyone who provides services to your retirement plan.
  2. If a proposed transaction involves (or is expected to involve in the future) a person on the DQP list in any way, stop. It might be a PT. Either don’t do the transaction or get help before proceeding.
  3. Seriously, don’t proceed without help.

It’s important to note that “involves in any way” (from #2 above) includes involvement of an LLC, trust, corporation or any other entity that has a DQP as part or whole owner, director, officer, employee, etc. PTs also include any scheme that intends to use plan assets to benefit a DQP even if indirectly.

If you can’t follow that 3 step process, you shouldn’t have a self directed account regardless of checkbook control because the risks are the same. If you are at risk of paying absolutely no attention to PT rules, then a custodian’s “we’ll keep you safe” vow doesn’t jive with their account terms and conditions, and you’ll be paying the price of your naivety if they overlook a PT.

Again, it’s easy to determine PT risk. If there’s a potential PT, only an attorney can give you definitive, binding advice. Your risk is absolutely identical with or without checkbook control: It’s your risk and your responsibility.

Are there any other reasons to want to transact at the custodial level?

The only other possible benefit of transacting at the custodial level is bookkeeping. If you can’t balance a checkbook or put bank statements, contracts, and settlements statements in a file folder… then you will have problems keeping your LLC’s books. Then again, if you don’t understand basic recordkeeping, you shouldn’t be a self directed investor yet, now should you?

What about FDIC insurace?

I’ve noticed FDIC insurance is a frequent component of this topic as well. IRAs have $250,000 of coverage while regular bank accounts have $100,000 of coverage. This should be of no consequence:

What about extra tax returns?

Checkbook control makes use of a single member LLC which the IRS disregards for tax purposes. In other words, there is no tax return required. If your IRA or LLC were to invest into a multiple member LLC partnership, a 1065 partnership return needs to be filed, but this is the case with or without checkbook control. Checkbook control creates no unique additional filing requirements.

Back to the big picture for risk of PT noncompliance:

If you pay no attention to PT rules and you transact at the custodial level, you are at high risk.

If you pay no attention to PT rules and you transact with checkbook control, you are at high risk.

If you follow the simple 3 step PT risk determination process described above and you transact at the custodial level, you are at low risk.

If you follow the simple 3 step PT risk determination process described above with checkbook control, you are at low risk.

If you do a PT at the custodial level, you pay the consequences.

If you do a PT with checkbook control, you pay the consequences.

You see, when you really break it down, there is actually no substance to the anti-checkbook-control argument.

But I’ve heard that the government is about to prohibit checkbook control?!

I dare you to find an official written source of this claim. I’ll give you a hint, your best chance is in the magazines you look at while waiting in line at the supermarket.

If you think that government prohibition of checkbook control is actually likely, consider that 401(k) plans (in fact all qualified plans) have never had a custodian requirement in the first place. That’s 27 years of checkbook control with no sign of change. Really think about this for a second. The government allows you to prepare your own tax return. You can lie and cheat on it if you are stupid enough. Outlawing checkbook control of retirement accounts is on par with outlawing self prepared tax returns.

So, get the facts and make your own choice. If you still think it’s best to transact at the custodial level, then that’s fine. Hey, millions of people still think it’s best to invest mostly in mutual funds and the world still turns.

Don’t get too tripped up on account structuring. Get the facts, make your decision and move on to the fun part: finding and making the investments.

Comments»

1. Heather - April 23, 2008

Jeff, I’d like to know how you would make contributions to an IRA, LLC.

2. Jeff Nabers - April 24, 2008

Sure – the IRA accountholder makes contributions to their IRA. The IRA then, as sole owner/member of the LLC, makes capital contributions to the LLC.

Contributions
Accountholder –> IRA –> LLC

Distributions to Accountholder
LLC –> IRA –> Accountholder
(accountholder pays ordinary income taxes on distributed amount unless it’s a Roth)

Distributions to IRA only
LLC –> IRA
(no distribution/income taxes due)

3. Craig - May 6, 2008

Are you allowed to have a multiple member LLC? For example both my wife and I create a single LLC and our IRAs make capital contributions to the LLC (in order to save corporate taxes).

4. Jeff Nabers - May 7, 2008

Craig,

An IRA can invest in a multiple member LLC. The potential issues are:

1. Securities – Membership units in a multiple member LLC could be securities. Depending on who else is in the LLC, you may have issues. See post “Eliminating Securities Problems – Part 1

2. Prohibited Transactions – If the other LLC partners are disqualified persons, certain actions may create a prohibited transaction. This gets slightly complex, I’ll be adding a post soon about it.

You mention saving on corporate taxes. Are you in a state that has high LLC taxes? Also think about the location of the assets you plan to purchase.

Example: Jon lives in an expensive registration state (such as California), but he plans on using his IRA LLC to purchase real estate in Georgia. The ownership of real estate in GA creates “nexus” and requires the LLC to be registered there. He can either:

Option A – Initially register his IRA’s LLC in CA (about $800 up front and each year thereafter) and then register that same LLC in GA as a foreign LLC (foreign meaning CA) for about $225. So a total cost of about $1025 up front and at least $800 per year.

Option B – Register his IRA’s LLC directly in GA for about $30.

——–
It’s always best to stay away from potential prohibited transactions. For that reason, if we setup your IRA LLC, I’d be willing to significantly discount your wife’s IRA LLC. Then you both could separately (and compliantly) invest using the concepts I talked about in the post “Eliminating Securities Problems – Part 2“.

5. Dee Nicholson - June 9, 2008

Jeff,
It’s hard to believe the IRS does not require a tax return of some type for the LLC. Usually, an LLC being a disregared entity created by an individual, the income from the LLC is reported on a 1040. SO, if I understand what you are saying, no year end reports are required, except the custodian filing the IRA FMV at year end? How does the LLC fill out the SS4 to get an EIN?

6. Jeff Nabers - June 9, 2008

Dee,

I’m pretty sure the specific process for completing an SS-4 is beyond the intended scope of this blog. We do, however, cover this type of material in the IRAAA Member Enrollment Course.

7. Dave Tugend - July 20, 2008

I am a California Real Estate Broker who plans to open a Self Directed IRA LLC for myself with the intention of purchasing residential real estate. I will take no commissions or accept any property management fees in conjuction with this property. Will this, in your opinion, avoid a possible PT.

8. Jeff Nabers - July 22, 2008

@Dave. I think it’s clearly not a PT.

9. Tom - July 27, 2008

If I create a special-purpose LLC and fund it with my IRA, can my parents and siblings invest in the LLC without creating a PT or potential PT? We plan to use the LLC to invest in real estate and other things, but the investments are not with each other.

10. Jeff Nabers - August 1, 2008

@Tom – I just wrote a post on this topic, and you can see it here. If you have any additional feedback, post a comment on that page.

11. joel isely - September 15, 2008

jeff,
i have recently changed jobs ad have about 140000 in a 403b,i would like to put that money in a check book IRA and use to help my sister who has a special needs child and needs to build an addition to her hous to this effect. i would like to loan her themoney at a relatively low interest rate ,can i do this??? She is not a DQ person but i didnt know if a loan like this without some kind of collateral and just a promissory note was possible.I know she is good for it and this would be a good investment for my money .

12. Jeff Nabers - September 17, 2008

Joel,

I think your proposed loan would be a prohibited transaction. Even though she isn’t technically a DQP, she’s obviously your close family. Loaning her money at a low rate of interest would probably be construed as you using the plan assets in your own interest (because you care about your sister and want to help her).

What’s the amount of the loan? Do you have any self employment activity?

If you’re eligible for a Solo 401k, you could borrow up to $50k from your plan and then personally loan it to her. Learn more here.

13. K Cyphers - November 2, 2008

I’m having trouble finding IRA custodians with low costs for a check book controlled LLC. I’m interested in buying tax liens and paying individual and annual costs for low cost transactions is cost prohibited. Would you provide a list of custodians specifically for a checkbook controlled LLC IRA?

14. Jeff Nabers - November 2, 2008

It’s hard to provide a list because most custodians can’t make up their mind about IRA LLCs. For many of them, one week they allow it, the next week they don’t.

My company is the only firm in existence who obtained an authorized licensed to use the document system from the attorney who created the special purpose IRA LLC. Our preferred custodian is Sunwest Trust because they never disallow legally allowable transactions based on company policy, and their fee schedule is nominal for the LLC – $190 per year. When you create an IRA LLC with my company, all you have to do is complete a 15 minute telephone application that includes all of the IRA paperwork.

Jeff

15. jntn - November 22, 2008

Hi
I have a question, Who moderated the forum?
You can get it icq

16. Jeff Nabers - November 23, 2008

@jntn – Who moderated what forum? Who can get what icq?

17. Dave C - December 5, 2008

This is similar to a question above. I am considering investing my IRA into a multi family rental property which I would like to manage myself. If I don’t take a managment fee am I still creating a prohibited transaction? The reason I ask is that I read someplace that you can’t put sweat equity into the property (i.e. fix the roof myself) because it would be an illegal contribution to the IRA. Wouldn’t managing the property be a form of sweat equty?

A related question. If I form an LLC with 3 friends and we each invest 25% into the same property, can I take a management fee for managing their share of the property without createing a PT?

Last question. I’m a Realtor. If my office takes a commission on the purchase is this a PT? (the seller pays the commission)

Thanks

18. Jeff Nabers - December 7, 2008

Good questions, Dave. The management duties that you can do are administrative: screening tenants, collecting rent, hiring contractors to do repairs, etc. You can’t perform physical labor (think of sweat equity as performing duties that would literally make you sweat). As for taking a management fee in a partnership arrangement – that would still be a prohibited transaction because you would make the decision to direct your IRA to invest in the partnership with the understanding that it would result in you personally receiving compensation.

As for real estate commissions… you can’t receive them from transactions involving your plan. In such transactions, I would recommend changing the commission agreements in the transaction to remove your side of the commissions and reduce the sales price by that amount.

19. Robert Epling - December 27, 2008

I remain unsure, it seems that in two places above you stated that being paid to manage ira assets would be PT. Yet in the body of the blog post above you suggested that with an ira llc you COULD manage and be paid a reasonable fee.

They seem contradictory, but I’m sure I just dont understand yet.

I am interested in moving on this very very quickly, so your response is eagerly awaited.

Thanks
Robert

20. Jeff Nabers - December 27, 2008

Hi, Robert. Can you please point out where and/or quote the text where you see me claiming that you could manage your IRA LLC and be paid a fee?

Jeff

21. Kristin Edmark - January 9, 2009

Dear Jeff,
Do I need to file a 1065 tax form an LLC whose members are 3 Roth IRAs? If not do I file anything? K-1s?

If I cannot have the LLC address be the same as my residence, can I use a PO Box for the LLC?

22. Jeff Nabers - January 21, 2009

Any time there is multiple members of an LLC, it is taxed as a partnership unless you made a specific election to be taxed as a corporation.

A partnership must file a 1065 return and each member/partner should receive a K-1 for their share of the profits or losses.

Using your address for the IRA LLC shouldn’t be an issue as it does not convey any benefits to any disqualified persons.

23. PypeScoognony - January 21, 2009

Nothing seems to be easier than seeing someone whom you can help but not helping.
I suggest we start giving it a try. Give love to the ones that need it.
God will appreciate it.

24. Thomas - January 22, 2009

If A ira with checkbbok control buys foreign property and has to set up a foreign LLC in order to do so, does the manager have to fill ,out form irs form 5471 . Foreign controled corp along with his personal tax return? The LLC then purcahses the shares of an SA [ which is essence is the property]

25. Jeff Nabers - January 22, 2009

Thomas,

Consult your legal and/or tax advisor(s).

26. Kristin Edmark - January 26, 2009

Dear Jeff,
For an LLC whose members are 3 Roth IRAs, can I add annual contributions from the 3 accounts at the custodian? Is it ok if not all three members contribute and the percentage ownership of the LLC changes?

27. Julie - February 2, 2009

Hi Jeff,

I’m a little confused on why you believe that lending money from an IRA to a sibling might be a prohibited transaction. I understand the closeness of the situation makes it appear to be a precarious transaction, but since they are not a DP it doesn’t seem that a loan or other investments with the IRA would be prohibited.

28. Jeff Nabers - February 2, 2009

IRC 4975(c)(1)(E) prohibits any direct or indirect act by a disqualified person who is a fiduciary whereby he deals with the income or assets of a plan in his own interests or for his own account.

It’s not an open and shut case that lending to a sibling is always a prohibited transaction. But this section of the tax code says that anything in your own interests is a prohibited transaction. It’s a tough argument to defend that lending money to your brother or sister isn’t in your own interests. They are your family, you love them, and it is in your interests. That would be the argument of the IRS in tax court, and I would not want to be opposed to it. Every scenario is unique, and some might carry better defense arguments, but generally I discourage plan loans to siblings. I like being better safe than sorry.

Again, with endless investment opportunities out there, my perspective says don’t risk anything that is in the general realm of what the IRS prohibits, and focus on investment transactions that only benefit the plan.

29. Jeff Nabers - February 2, 2009

@ Kristin – Making member contributions disproportionate to existing ownership could be okay if each of the accountholders aren’t disqualified persons to either of the other 2 plans.

30. Roger - February 28, 2009

my wife and i each have several iras, 401ks, tsas and profit sharings from former employers. we would like to roll them all over and self direct them. do we have to have a separate ira for each or can they all be rolled over into one new ira? in turn, in either event of multiple or one ira, can they be moved to a 2-member llc with the members, of course, being my wife and myself?

31. Jeff Nabers - March 2, 2009

Roger,

Great questions. It would be best for you to simply call my office at 877-903-2220.

Looking forward to assisting you,

Jeff

32. JP - March 2, 2009

I was recently speaking with someone about self directed IRA’s and they brought up something that was “new” and was not in-line with what is floating around the Internet. It is regarding self directed IRA LLC’s. In the past, I learned that the custodial account (the IRA), can be 100% owner of the LLC and sole member. Now, I was told the IRS is stressing to have the IRA own no more than 49.5%. Did you hear anything about this?

33. Jeff Nabers - March 2, 2009

Various people and/or companies have been making up “What the IRS is thinking and doing about IRA LLCs” for several years. None of it is founded in any actual events or communications.

The issue is what is and isn’t a prohibited transaction. Prohibited transactions are governed by the Department of Labor rather than the IRS. DOL has issued their opinion numerous times and consistently: an IRA LLC being formed and used for investment does not, in and of itself, create a prohibited transaction regardless of how much of the LLC is owned by the IRA.

34. JP - March 2, 2009

Thanks for your reply. I have 2 IRA LLC’s, fiancee has 1 IRA LLC, mom has 1 Single Member LLC, and I have Individual 401k (Profit Sharing & Roth) for a total of 6 accounts. I would like to create a new LLC as a “holding” company and each of these already established entities would be the new forming members of this new LLC. Me and my fiancee would be the operating managers of this new LLC. Do you forsee any problem for a prohibited transaction or disqualified person being involved in the wrong way with this new LLC?

35. Jeff Nabers - March 2, 2009

JP,

The most accurate and brief answer is yes & no. It is outside the scope of a blog comment conversation. Please call my office at 877-903-2220 for a more elaborate approach to assistance.

Jeff

36. RM - March 6, 2009

Could you please clarify for me:

If an investment group/club forms an LLC and several members are IRA LLCs, how can a 1065 be filed for the investment club LLC and K-1’s be filed/given for the IRA LLCs unless the IRA LLCs apply for Tax IDs?

37. Jeff Nabers - March 6, 2009

RM,

The K-1s have to be issued to a person or entity that has a SSN or EIN.

Jeff

p.s. Any IRA LLC formed by my company will have an EIN.

38. Lori - March 17, 2009

How do I file a 1065 for an LLC that has 4 IRAs? 2 are Roth IRAs owned by my husband and myself, and 2 are SEP IRAs owned by each of us. I can only get one EIN number for 1 IRA for each of us. The IRS doesn’t allow me to get a second EIN for more than one IRA in my own name. Secondly, my state (Tennessee) does not recognize partnerships or LLCs and treats them like a corp. How do I avoid paying income tax on the income of the LLC?

39. Jeff Nabers - March 17, 2009

Lori,

You should be able to file the 1065 like you would with any partnership. If some of the partners have the same EIN, it might not matter (at least for the federal returns) since the IRAs themselves wouldn’t normally file a tax return that includes the K-1 anyways. I can’t comment on any laws or regs for the state of Tennessee. You should definitely run all of this by your CPA.

Jeff

40. Lori - March 18, 2009

Can you make any referrals to a CPA in Tennessee who is familiar with these LLCs? I am having trouble finding one who knows anything about self directed IRA’s and the LLCs associated with them.

41. Jeff Nabers - March 18, 2009

Lori,

I wish I could, but I don’t know any in TN. Who setup your accounts & structures? Why aren’t they supporting you?

Jeff

42. Andras Arato - March 21, 2009

Jeff,

Let’s say I open a business as a sole propreitor and operate it for 1-2 years. For legitimate reasons I have to close shop. Can I keep my Solo 401(K) account and manage it until retirement (perform rollovers for example) ? It would be fine if I could not make any additional contribution.

Thanks,

Andras

43. Kamau - April 2, 2009

Jeff,
we are considering using Guident to set up a Self Directed IRA and LLC for us. They tell us they will use Trust America as the Custodian. We cannot locate Trust America on the IRS approved list of Custodians. We would appreciate any comments you can provide.

44. Jeff Nabers - April 3, 2009

Kamau,

The 3 ways a company can serve as custodian are to be either:

1. A bank,
2. A trust company, or
3. Specifically approved by IRS

Trust America is probably #2. If so, it wouldn’t need to be #3. Usually to include the word “trust” as a separate word in the name of company requires them to be a registered trust company.

On the other hand, there may be another item of concern. My company, Nabers Group, is the only company in existence who has received a license for the IRA LLC document system from its creator, Debra Buchanan. I worked personally with Debra and government officials to improve the compliance of our IRA LLC document system, and all of the companies who use Debra’s original documents without authorization have not received the numerous document updates. I’ve been told by Debra that Guidant uses her IRA LLC documents without authorization. Frankly, I don’t know the details of their law suit, but I’m sharing with you what I’ve been told.

Secondly, I am concerned about the recent happenings over at Guidant. Their main product, a 401k business funding structure, appears to be a setup that helps people intentionally do a prohibited transaction in the hopes that they are covered by a certain exemption. A few weeks ago Guidant suspended sales of that product due to regulatory concerns. A couple of weeks later, they relaunched the product. I haven’t talked to the Guidant guys in a while, but that activity certainly raises some questions.

If you are looking for the IRA LLC, my company has the most developed and compliant solutions out there because we are the only company who has the license form the creator of the IRA LLC. You can get more info by calling my office at 877-903-2220.

45. Larry Beane - April 22, 2009

Jeff,

I am starting an IRA LLC in Nevada but I live in CA. My investment property is also in CA. I am hearing that the LLC should be in the same state that the property is in to avoid any problems with the state of CA in the event of a lawsuit (either brought by me against a tenant or vice versa). Also, most banks require that the LLC checking acct be opened in the state where the LLC is registered. However, the physical address of the LLC can be my own CA address (or so I am told by the NV resident agent I hired) and thereby avoid the snag with the bank. Can you enlighten me?

Thanks,
Larry

46. Larry Beane - April 23, 2009

Here’s another one for you Jeff,

I just read that the IRA custodian can be directed to fund the retirement plan in my own S-corporation which can then be used to invest in the company. I have a company (that I can convert to an S-corp) that charters sailboats. Could I purchase a sailboat to charter with these funds? If so, would it be a PT to also use the boat for personal use? (I assume living aboard would be a big no-no – right?)

Larry

47. Jeff Nabers - April 24, 2009

Larry,

In response to your first question, if you are primarily going to be buying real estate in CA, why do you aim to register the LLC in NV? Doing so will caust you to pay two sets worth of fees and/or taxes. You will have to pay fees to register the NV LLC, file annual reports in NV, and then register the same LLC as a foreign entity in CA and pay the $800+ franchise tax there.

Owning real estate in California creates “nexus” and thus requires any corporate entity to register in CA.

Second question response – If “you have a company” then your IRA cannot transact with that company without creating a prohibited transaction. Also, any personal use of any IRA-owned asset by a disqualified person (including you and most of your family) is a prohibited transaction.

I recommend you refocus your ideas towards investment opportunities that don’t involve you or your companies on the other end of the transaction. There is a world of opportunities out there.

Jeff

48. Larry Beane - April 25, 2009

Well, I am getting mixed info about where to register the LLC. I’ve read that it doesn’t matter. So, NV is the least expensive state and I am trying to avoid paying CA’s $800 annual franchiise fee. Others say what you say.

It makes sense that it shouldn’t matter because suppose I plan to invest all over the country, would I then need to register an LLC in every state where I own a property?

Larry

49. Jeff Nabers - April 26, 2009

Re: Mixed Info

Conflicting information is common in this field; it’s the reason why I got into the field (to debunk the bad info and demystify these topics).

It doesn’t matter what two different people think about this; it matters what the California government thinks about this, and they are greedy. California is one of the most tax-heavy states. And guess what? They think that real estate ownership creates nexus which means that when an LLC owns real estate in CA, it must be registered in CA & pay the $800 franchise tax.

See this official CA document here.

On page 2, it offers examples of “unprotected activities” (those that create nexus and require registration) and “protected activities” (those that do not create nexus or require registration).

As you see, unprotected item 16(i) is ownership of real estate.

You can believe your other source or you can believe the State of California.

Also, if you were to invest your plan all over the country (into real estate), then yes you would need to register your LLC in every State in which you own property and in which the nexus laws are similar to CA. This doesn’t mean creating 50 different LLCs. It means creating 1 LLC and registering it as a foreign entity in the other 49 states.

Larry

50. Larry Beane - April 28, 2009

Thank you, Jeff, for the clarification. The CA property deal fell though (I actually let it fall through because my NV LLC isn’t quite set up yet), so, I think, since rents are the same in the aea where the CA property is and those in AZ, that I will look at AZ for my IRA LLC property. That $800 franchise fee really takes a bite. CA can stick it! Do you happen to know about AZ LLC laws? Will I need to register the LLC in AZ as a foreign entity? What fees, if any, will I have to pay AZ?

Thanks so much!

51. Larry Beane - April 28, 2009

Jeff,

What do you know about the differences between an IRA LLC and a self-directed IRA Trust? I read that one gets the same liability protection in a Trust as an LLC but can avoid all the taxes, fees and the annual LLC report to the state where the LLC is located. Also, one can avoid registering the LLC as a foreign entity in states where the property is located if different from where the LLC is registered. The Trust also serves as the custodian. The Trust company that I just talked to charges $50 to set up the trust then an annual percentage of the value of the IRA ($440 for IRAs valued between $100,000 and $200,000). The trust seems like a better deal than an IRA LLC. What do you think?

Larry

52. Jeff Nabers - April 28, 2009

Larry,

My company registers LLCs in all 50 states. For a clarification of when an entity is a “foreign” entity, just call my office at 877-903-2220 and go through our assisted due diligence process. Your first phone call will probably take 8 to 10 minutes and it will get you on track to figuring things out.

An IRA trust is interesting. An IRA is a trust in the first place so creating an IRA trust trust is sure to make the government think something fishy is going on.

Most states have a statue that defines a business trust and subjects business trusts to the very same taxes they apply to LLCs. Any state that is overzealous in its taxing of LLCs will likely be overzealous in applying those same taxes to an IRA trust trust.

What you’ve come across is clever marketing, but it probably won’t get you off the hook from paying franchise type taxes to state authorities.

Again for more info and to get things sorted out call 877-903-2220.

Jeff

53. anthony - April 30, 2009

I read that one pt is that I can’t buy property I already own without an exemption…is that true? And if so, how do I get the exemption? I have a place that I’m trying to sell, but given the current market conditions, I thought I could just buy it myself.

54. Jeff Nabers - April 30, 2009

Anthony,

You’re right; what you described would be a prohibited transaction. You can’t get an exemption.

The Department of Labor gives exemptions sometimes for cases where a person wasn’t clear about whether their proposed transaction was prohibited. They’ll give an exemption when that proposed transaction isn’t in violation of the PT rules.

It may seem unfortunate that you can’t use your IRA to buy a property from yourself for more than its real market price, but I think it’s fortunate. Hopefully, these rules will restore your attention to good, profitable investment moves you can make inside your tax-favored retirement account.

Jeff

55. anthony - April 30, 2009

Thank you for the reply, but I actually wanted to just buy it for what I owe, which is about 50% of what I paid for it. I wasn’t looking to make a profit off of it, just to get it out my name and into the IRA. I guess I will have to sell it and find something else.

thanks again.

56. Jeff Nabers - April 30, 2009

If the price you seek is a fair market price, then you should have no problem selling it on the market to a third party.

57. Janine Peterson - May 7, 2009

Jeff, your site is very informative. Thank you.
Three questions:
(1) Would the creation of the IRA LLC for checkbook control trigger the UBIT mentioned in your other posts if the entity is a pass through such as a partnership? Since the IRA would own the LLC it seems that it might.

(2) Can an IRA own a partial interest in a property along with other individuals or business entities?

(3) Can an IRA own an interest in a limited partnership which holds real estate? Would this trigger any UBIT?

I would appreciate any information you can provide on these topics, thank you.

58. Jeff Nabers - May 11, 2009

Janine,

(1) No. UBIT isn’t triggered by a structure; it’s triggered by activity.

(2) Yes

(3) Yes. It depends on the activities of the partnership.

The best way for you to get these topics more into focus is to call my office at 877-903-2220. All we do all day long is help people like you with your self-directed investing endeavors. :-)

Jeff

59. Kris Thurmond - June 5, 2009

Dear Jeff,
I am so thankful to find your site It has provided such wonderful information! Here is my question, I live in Florida my mortgage was funded through a self directed IRA from California I find NO LLC in Florida It appears that usury laws may have been violated If the property is in Florida the IRA is in Calfornia which usury laws apply? Thanks Kris

60. Jeff Nabers - June 5, 2009

@ Kris. That is certainly a legal question. While I can often point people in the right direction to cut down on legal bills, for this type of question the first stop should probably be an attorney in FL.

Jeff

61. Rajan - June 16, 2009

IS a california IRA LLC exempt from state franchise tax of $800.00
How should one go about to get this exemption? If available.

62. Jeff Nabers - June 17, 2009

Rajan,

No LLC that does business in CA is exempt from its state franchise tax. Check out http://www.solo401k.com to learn about an alternative to the Self-Directed IRA LLC for self-employed people.

Jeff

63. Alex - June 24, 2009

Hi Jeff,

I am looking at doing several real estate deals around the country. My objective to isolate the liabilities of each individual project. Can I set up a “master” IRA LLC to have checkbook control, and then create an LLC for each individual real estate project (where each LLC is 100% owned by the “master” IRA LLC), or do I need to create a unique IRA LLC for each project? If an LLC owns another LLC, is that still considered a single member LLC situation (freeing me from the need to file tax returns)?

Thanks in advance!

64. Jeff Nabers - June 24, 2009

Alex,

Yes one LLC can own another. Any LLC is considered a single member LLC if there is only one member.

Before setting everything up, I recommend you call my office to strengthen your due diligence. 877-903-2220.

Jeff

65. William Williams - June 25, 2009

Jeff, I live in NC and want to setup an SDIRA with rollover funds from my 403. I am looking at a storefront in nearby SC which will be rented. The tenent may sublet all or part of the building. Where are the landmines?

66. Gregg - June 25, 2009

Hi Jeff – great website!

I want to use a checkbook IRA/LLC to purchase a laundromat. It is a Roth IRA, and I intend to create a C-Corp that the LLC would own (LLC would own either 80% or 100% of the stock). The IRA/LLC would make a relatively small investment to purchase the stock. The remainder of the money to purchase the business (inside the C-Corp) would come from a loan made by the IRA/LLC to the C-Corp. The idea being that the interest on the loan would be a tax deduction to the C-Corp, but tax free income to the IRA/LLC. The C-Corp’s taxable income (after the deduction for interest) would be below $50,000 per year so it would only be taxed at 15% (plus about 4% for state). I would then issue dividends from the C-Corp to the IRA/LLC to get the money out of the C-Corp.

My understanding is that if I buy the laundromat itself directly through the IRA/LLC it would generate unrelated business taxable income, and the tax brackets for this “trust” income are much “smaller” than those of a C-Corp (i.e., taxable income over $10,700 per year is taxed at 35% for a trust).

Is it correct that if the IRA/LLC purchased the business directly it would generate unrelated business taxable income? If not, would it be taxable income at all?

If I am better off from a tax standpoint to create the C-Corp to own the business, is it alright for the IRA/LLC to loan the C-Corp money and also own the stock? Also, assuming I have a non-disqualifed person doing all of the management and all of the work related to this business can my IRA/LLC own 100% of the stock in the C-Corp? Alternatively, can I perform some services for this C-Corp without it being a prohibited transaction? I would pay myself “reasonable compensation”. I greatly appreciate any input you can give me. Thanks,

Gregg

67. Sam F. - July 21, 2009

I am amazed at the ‘lazy’ questions you get asked, such as, what are a specific state’s LLC requirements, etc. Your blog sessions have been extremely informative for me. I have to rate you at the top of my list for these topics.

68. rod - August 5, 2009

Rod E.

If I purchase a property and have my possible future son in law do the rehab would that be ok?

69. Jeff Nabers - August 5, 2009

@WilliamWilliams & @Gregg,

Your questions are outside the scope of this blog post, but I invite you to call my office for more information –> 877-903-2220

70. Jeff Nabers - August 5, 2009

Rod,

Your son-in-law is considered a disqualified person, so you should not involve him in any IRA or 401k transactions or property rehab. Learn more at:

http://jeffnabers.com/2008/04/24/prohibited-transaction-basics/

Jeff

71. rod - August 9, 2009

Jeff,

If you buy real estate in your ira do you still get the depreciation and how is it calculated. Also when you sell you will be taxed at ordinary income rates versus long term cap rates that are less, does it make sense to put real estate into your ira?

72. rod - August 9, 2009

Jeff,

I’m interested in the solo 401k but how would I Qualify for one, I have some rental property outside of my ira money. I understand I have to be self employed, what would be the easiest way to accomplish that and the least expensive?

73. Doftelipiet - August 13, 2009

This looks cool so far, what’s up people?
If it’s not just all bots here, let me know. I’m looking to network
Oh, and yes I’m a real person LOL.

Later,

74. John Smithe - August 20, 2009

Jeff,
I was under the impression that if I were to create an IRA/LLC have it buy a rental house, that my wife could manage the property (collected rents etc.) and that I could do maintence type items (paint the inside inbetween renters) as long as I was not paid and the IRA picked up the cost of materials, but that I would be prevented from doing capital improvement type projects?

Where in the law or rulings do the prohibitions on this type of activity reside – Would I be at risk of creating a prohibited transaction?, or would I just risk creating a unrelated business income tax liability that the IRA must have funds to cover?

75. Jeff Nabers - August 22, 2009

@Rod, the best recommendation I have is to call my office at 877-903-2220 :-)

@John. Yes you would be creating a prohibited transaction. See this post here.

76. Dev - September 10, 2009

hi jeff,

I have question on SDIRA LLC. Can SDIRA LLC take a loan from banks or other financial institutions, if yes what are the procedural aspects.
why because my LLC do not have enough money to invest in real state of outside the USA.

77. Jeff Nabers - September 10, 2009

Dev,

Your IRA LLC can only take out a non-recourse loan. For more information and assistance, call our office at 877-903-2220 :-)

Jeff

78. Dev - September 11, 2009

Thank you Jeff

79. Dev - September 11, 2009

Thank you Jeff, Can you please confirm me can I inverst in Real Estate in India???

80. Dev - September 11, 2009

Dear Jeff one more, I am manager of Single memeber SDIRA LLC and can I make joint investment in real estate with my LLC.

81. Jeff Nabers - September 11, 2009

Dev,

The best way to get further assistance is to call our office at 877-903-2220.

Jeff

82. Dev - September 11, 2009

Thank you Jeff and I will contact your office very soon.

83. hypnoticgenius - September 19, 2009

Hi all,

New to the forum, just thought I’d introduce myself :-)

84. Chris - October 7, 2009

Hi Jeff,

I am considering taking a portion of my traditional IRA and starting a checkbook IRA/LLC IRA for the purpose of buying gold. Are there any restrictions on using the the LLC to open a futures account at a registered broker and buying regulated futures contracts?

85. Jeff Nabers - October 8, 2009

Chris,

There are no particular restrictions on futures contracts, but more importantly, it would help for you to understand the overall approach of how to run your IRA LLC and how not to. Call my office and we can help you through your due diligence process 877-903-2220 :-)

Jeff

86. catherine - October 21, 2009

My daughter has a real estate partnership with me (her mother) we have 2 buildings 50/50- i’d like to let her have one and i take the other to emancipate her from our real estate partnership ( i buy her out she buys me out) this i am aware is disqualified i assume from using my ira funds to buy her out but maybe not . at the same time she could take her ira funds from below and buy me out ?

Also, she has a sole proprietorship consulting firm doing editorial writing, media design, graphics, promo, publicity, events and music writing recording and band perfomances

she has been working and deferring paying herself a salary – actually she has been investing her trust money into her business capital – she pays her subcontracted help and keeps little earnings – operating at a loss these last 2 years

never having contributed to any ira’s. can she convert her sole company into an llc and fund 49k into a solo 401k plan with money she was using to capitalize the company from her now released and vested trustmoney from her deceased father ? can she go back 2 years and pay herself the deferred salary now that she has funds free and clear as she is emancipated from the trust at age 25?

can she also take some more trust money and set up a real estate ira llc? to buy out my half of the income property?

87. Jeff Nabers - October 21, 2009

Catherine,

The best way to get more information about self-directed IRA & 401k investing is to call our office at 877-903-2220 :-)

Jeff

88. Dave - November 4, 2009

Hi Jeff,

Can an IRA LLC have a credit card with the IRA account owner (acting LLC Manager) as the guarantor of the credit card account? The concern here is whether the use of credit card considered a PT.

Thanks,

Dave

89. Jeff Nabers - November 5, 2009

Dave,

An IRA accountholder cannot guarantee loans for his/her IRA or IRA LLC. This includes a credit card.

– Jeff

90. Dave - November 11, 2009

Can a checkbook IRA be maintained offshore?

Does this provide any additional protection against the rumored government takeover of IRAs (being forced into SS fund and pay out a small, fixed amount)?

Thanks.

91. Jeff Nabers - November 12, 2009

Dave,

These issues are more complex than “yes or no” questions. I suggest you call our office at 877-903-2220.

– Jeff

92. domaAnarm - December 18, 2009

Hello to All the Guests and Members,
My PC worked slowly, many errors. Help me, please to fix errors on my computer.
My operation system is Win Vista.
Thanks,
domaAnarm

93. Ed - January 11, 2010

1- When using an IRA with checkbook control and you wish to invest in ETF’s, stocks or futures is it as simple as writing a check to a broker account.

2- If you are using a broker with an existing account do you have to establish a new account or can you use the existing account.

94. admin - January 14, 2010

1 – Yes, when properly setup

2 – Establish a new account

Don’t hesitate to call my office for assistance 877-903-2220 :-)

Jeff

95. Pleadyloary - January 31, 2010

Hi I just registered to this spacious place jeffnabers.com . I want to ask for your opinion.
Can you tell me please do you trade forex and if yes what forex dealer do you use?
Do you know of some reliable ones?

Thanks in advance for your answers.

P.S. Sorry if I have posted to wrong section this but as you can notice I am new here.

96. admin - February 2, 2010

Pleadyloary,

Thanks for participating in my blog!

Re: choosing forex dealer:

As one would choose a casino, for most people choosing a forex dealer should be of little consequence to the end result.

I’m sure there are systems and people who are making loads of money in forex, but it doesn’t change the fundamental enormity of the risk involved. Even those who make loads of money often lose it back.

If you explore more of the blog here, you may gain further insight as to why I would consider forex to not actually be “investing.”

I hope you’ll be able to benefit from my blog as an information resource :-)

Jeff

97. jitiocaictriz - February 8, 2010

Just wanted to say hello to all here. This is my first posting here.

It definitely seems like the owners of the group sure are doing a marvellous job.

I look forward to find a lot of information here & assist others as much as I can.